Some reaction to my most recent post.
by BeamStalk » Mon May 10, 2010 10:16 pm
He is f@#%ing retarded.
Wow. What an impressive argument. I am almost convinced of my wrongheadedness.
Does rufus really think this is the argument? I sense a lack of logical ability here.
They think that just by saying that objective moral values come from "God", that it's true. We made up "gods" to justify our moral values. It used to be the best way to get people to pay attention to those values. Fear of god, fear of punishment. And even then, it didn't work very well.
Whatev, if it's just plain evil that is proposed on the problem of evil, this is an ineffective argument. It's fairly easy to show that God and plain ol' evil could coexist using the free will defense. I'm trying to help you out here.
First off, the problem of evil involves gratuitous (purposeless) evil? Since when? The Nazis were purposeful and represented the state-of-the-art of evil; an all powerful all beneficent deity should have stopped them.
Mr. Tub is trying to make fun of me because I have so often pointed out the red herrings he introduces when trolling on Christian blogs. But whose fault is that?
That's all that's really notable as of now. I find it interesting they haven't dealt with my argument. I see a lot of appeal to ridicule and red herrings, but where's the refutation? Your precious argument from evil is on the line here!!!!!111!!!!1!1oneone